




Threat of Oil Supply Shock Worries Energy Subcommittee
by David Lightman Courant.com, Washington,Wednesday, May 17, 2006"As if high energy prices were not enough of a problem, members of a House panel were briefed Tuesday on another reason for concern: the possibility that unfriendly countries could cut off oil supplies to hurt the United States.
"Today we cannot effectively counter the use of energy as a weapon," Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House energy subcommittee, said as he set the stage for testimony from several government experts..."
"...It said that unlike other periods in American history when prices soared, the latest round of increases is driven by demand, not tight supply. But supplies have tightened, the study found, meaning "the U.S. is more vulnerable to a catastrophic supply shock, especially considering the current geopolitical environment.""We are witnessing growing tendencies in producing countries to manipulate the use of their natural resources," agreed Karen A. Harbert, the Energy Department's assistant secretary for policy and international affairs..."
Beside ridding ourselves of such useless parasites and politicians like George W. Bush, we need immediately begin massive conservation and efficiency measures. The only way we as citizens can protect ourselves is to become as independent as we can from foreign oil.
At a minimum, this means
Published on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 by the South Florida Sun-Sentinel |
by Robert P. Watson "...From the great presidents we know that the country is well-served by leaders who exhibit the following traits:
"... Bush has been tone deaf, disinterested in advice and evidence that contradict his beliefs, intellectually disengaged from the crises that have enveloped his administration, and arrogant in exercising power. Bush's failure is most apparent in the major crises of his presidency, namely mishandling the war in Iraq and Hurricane Katrina, recklessly amassing the world's largest deficits and debt, and failing to lead on pressing challenges such as the skyrocketing costs of health care, fuel and a college education..." "...Indeed, the president has long passed the point of simply being untrustworthy; he has made a mockery of the office. That Bush will be remembered by history as a failure is now conventional wisdom among scholars of the presidency..." I see the bumper stickers are some cars, "Bush 04", and I think to myself, "What kind of fool would admit they supported George W. Bush?" If I were them I would not only remove the offending 'Bush' sticker, but I would rip off the bumper it was attached to. Maybe I'll just do it for them.... |
Supreme Court Officially Emasculates Taxpayers
By David Sirota
Working For Change Tuesday 16 May 2006
"In a unanimous decision Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a lower court ruling that would have invalidated massive taxpayer giveaways to Corporate America..."
"...Today's ruling, though, is particularly egregious. Not only did the court strike down an important ruling, but it essentially emasculated taxpayers' ability to bring any such lawsuits against their own government in the future..."
This case started in Ohio were taxpayers sued the State for diverting taxpayer money away from local schools and gave it to DaimlerChrysler in the form of tax rebates and incentives. $300 million in taxpayer cash! Schools were closed because of this giveaway.
So the taxpayers sued to regain control of how their tax money was spent. The U.S. Supreme Court in upholding the State's rights over the taxpayer has sent a signal that the United States Taxpayer has no control or input to how the State decides to spend their tax dollars. Lets suppose that Senator X wants to open a business for his mistress, FiFi. But he sure doesn't want to spend his own money on this. So he grabs some taxpayer loot, maybe $200,000 or $300,000, hands it to FiFi and she opens a nail boutique for Rottweilers.
This is perfectly legal. Senator X isn't taking the money himself, he is investing it in a local commerical enterprise, therebye creating jobs and assisting the economy. But the taxpayer is on the hook for a dog salon that is owned by his mistress. According the the U.S. Supreme Court, the taxpayer has NO SAY in how his or her tax money is spent.
"The United States is essentially the Saudi Arabia of coal," Mr. Holmes said. "It can be mined relatively inexpensively. We really believe that one of the things we can do to help our country's energy needs is to use the abundance of coal reserves.".."
By Terry J. Allen, In These Times. Posted May 11, 2006.
"...If you are one of the more than 200 million Americans with a cell phone nestled in your pocket, authorities may be able to find you any time day or night--even if you never make or receive a call..."By Robert B. Reich, TomPaine.com. Posted May 12, 2006.
"...Until now, a basic principle of the Internet has been that the pipe companies can't discriminate among content providers. Everyone who puts stuff up on the Internet is treated exactly the same. The net is neutral.But now the pipe companies want to charge the content providers, depending on how fast and reliably the pipes deliver the content. Presumably, the biggest content providers would pay the most money, leaving the little content people in the slowest and least-reliable parts of the pipe. (It will take you five minutes to download my blog.) The pipe companies claim unless they start charge for speed and reliability, they won't have enough money to invest in the next generation of networks. This is an absurd argument. The pipes are already making lots of money off consumers who pay them for being connected to the Internet..."
The Sheeple of America are being branded, herded, and slaughtered and they don't have a clue that it is all premeditated.
=============================
Harris Poll reports Bush at 29%. No surprise...Worst President of all time! I wonder when it will hit the single digits...and will it even matter? Will Americans do anything about it? CAN Americans even do anything about it?
=============================
We are buying a new home. Yesterday I looked at the loan documents and, as always, I am absolutely apalled at what passes for Bank Fraud these days. My interest rate shows 6.8% which dosen't sound too bad. Little high perhaps, but ok. However, when I look at how much money I will actually pay in interest and how much I pay in priniciple I notice a funny thing. The Interest I will pay over the life of the loan is nearly $50,000 higher than the cost of the house itself. $50 GRAND HIGHER? I may not be much of a wiz at math, but I do know that when you pay more in interest than the house is worth then that ain't 6.8%. For example, If my house sold for $400,000 and I pay another $400,000 in interest, than I have a loan interest rate of 100%! Right? My interest rate matches my principle dollar for dollar. That is a 100% loan! But if my interest is way over the principle, then my interest is way over 100%.
It occurs to me that Americans are being bled white by corporate and bank malveasance. And the Bush Administration is their partner in crime. The worst part is that it is all Institutionalized. It's normal. In this society, if a man comes up to you and stickes a gun in your face, demanding money, then he is a criminal and may get jailed. However, if you walk into a bank voluntarily, sign the papers, and the banker demands you pay him 150% of what your loan is worth, that is legal. InAmerica it is standard practice for corporations to create laws and regulations that give them the absolute control over their customers. They hide their villany behind smug thousand dollar suits and citrus aftershave. The corporate elite.
The Cosa Nostra, of legend and fame, would faint with envy at what the Bush Administration and the Corporate World can steal.
But whatta ya gonna do? We signed the papers.
===========================
One last thing. You may have heard this all before, but pay attention! Check out your credit scores and data with the three major credit companies: Experian; Transunion; and Equifax. Each is bought and paid for by U.S. Corporations and their bias is toward business. In fact, they will deliberately enter information on you that they do not check out for veracity. Some of their negative comments are on things that you have no control over. For instance, you will get a downgraded credit score if you have too many inquiries to these three credit agencies. How the hell can you control that? And does anybody know how many contacts is too many? These Credit agencies judge your credit worthiness on a issues that have little, if any, direct relationship to wether you pay your bills on time and in the right amount. It is a totally bogus system.
It accures to me that American Capitalistic Corporations are predatory, unethical, devious, untrustworthy, unscrupulous, and have no real regulatory or legal contraints on their business behavior. American Business have taken the term "Sic Caveat Emptor" as their only ethical creed. By the way, 'Sic Caveat Emptor' is latin for "Fuck em, they have our money in their pockets".
Despite all my bitching, we have a good credit score...I can only imagine what it is like for someone with marginal or 'bad' credit numbers.
Well, we will get our house and I will calm down eventually. I just hate being screwed by corporations and know that there is little I can do about it.
Tuesday 09 May 2006
"Congress wants to change the Internet.
This is news to most people because the major news media have not actively pursued the story. Yet both the House and Senate commerce committees are promoting new rules governing the manner by which most Americans receive the Web. Congressional passage of new rules is widely anticipated, as is President Bush's signature. Once this happens, the Internet will change before your eyes.
The proposed House legislation, the Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act (COPE), offers no protections for "network neutrality."..